I have recently been catching up with podcasts and one of the podcasts that I enjoy is from the Lowy Institute for International Policy. The specific podcast that got me thinking was one by Anthony Bubalo and Dr Malcom Cook on Horizontal Asia. The start of their paper can be read at The American Interest and in essence it posits that our traditional maritime and East Asian focus towards 'Asia' has to change, we need to realise that Asia is moving west, towards India, Iran, Central Asia, etc. Asian countries are also more continentally focused than we realise. I am not particularly stunned by this view as I believe that we are seeing the re-emergence of traditional strategic concerns that were overshadowed by the Cold War.
China traditionally looked west and northwards towards the barbarians, the Great Wall was built in the interior and not on the coast to ward off sea threats. China's view on maritime affairs seemed to be riverine and by exception, as the Zheng Ho trips showed, ocean going. The Mongols showed that Asia was part of the Eurasian landmass and made it as far as both Europe and the Middle East. India has seen invaders sweep down from what is now Central asia and has also had dynasties try to head the other way as well. While it does have a maritime legacy, such as from the Chola Empire it is the continental influences that have proved most dominant.
I doubt if anybody is claiming that Asia is exclusively focused towards the geographic West now I think people are using this trend as a way to show that the way that we view Asia, as East Asia and from a maritime perspective, is not correct and is not how Asians see themselves. I think by taking a longer historic view we will not be surprised at this and will understand that the traditional strategic concerns are re-emerging while Asia is still intent to embrace the opportunities presented by countries such as the USA. The Mongols had no trouble understanding that there were benefits in both the East and West.